Emacs Has Been Waiting for Data Science
I'm pretty happy with my (neo)vim setup. Wielding it, I can walk into most code bases and be useful. There comes a point, though, where we hit a wall, look at Jupyter or VSCode, and think "damn, that actually is pretty useful." This started happening more frequently as my workflow transitioned to terminal-based tooling for Python and away from Jupyter and PyCharm. Suddenly, I found myself lacking some of the basics we need to do useful data science, like rich text (math) and images (plots). I don't want to give up my precious all-about-me editing experience, though, and if I can avoid proprietary software, I will.
Like most fledgling data scientists, my journey began on a Jupyter notebook, followed by JupyterLab, when it came out. After learning that "hey, I can make my own libraries too!", I found Spyder from the Anaconda ecosystem, jumped to PyCharm for a while, all the while using a dash of Vim on the side. Recently, I went all-in on a lua configuration for Neovim, and that's been my home for the last couple years now, except for when I just need a notebook. Typically I still turn to JupyterLab when I need a literate programming environment, with access to plotting inline with code. Sometimes a notebook is just the right thing for the job. Other times, I need a text editor and a language server for some back-end work. I want a free/libre environment that supports both of these, and right now I don't think the options are great.
- Spyder is probably the closest right now, but I have the least experience with it. The messaging from their website is wholly python-centric, though, and I'm looking for a much more generic tool. I also have no idea how well it handles remote project development
- VSCode is currently the gold standard in terms of "just working" out of the box. I haven't seen anything integrate with remote development, including Jupyter notebooks, as well as this one does. It doesn't meet the "libre" requirement, though, and Microsoft has no plans for opening its pylance server either
- PyCharm is a behemoth powerhouse for working on a local codebase. It absolutely falls apart when trying to work on remote projects
- Vim and Neovim are terminal editors, and by their very nature are not designed for displaying images. Really, they are designed to address the physical act of editing text, and leave the other components of your development workflow to be integrated some other way (i.e. running commands in one tmux window and vim in the other)
- I think Pluto is incredibly slick, and I wish more notebooking environments operated like it
So where does this leave us? Emacs has:
- Rich text and image display (as a GUI program)
- Inline literate programming via
org-mode, and many Jupyter integration projects
- Support for basically every programming language on the planet
- Tree-sitter and Language Server Protocol (LSP) support, with the option to choose our own server
- A fully featured general programming language for configuration and extension (Emacs LISP)
- An enormous integrated help and documentation system
- Cross-platform to Windows, Linux, and macOS
- Libre license (GNU GPL 3.0)
- Built-in remote development support (via TRAMP)
- Terminal emulation via any of `M-x term`, `M-x shell`, or `M-x eshell`
All that to say Emacs is a tempting offer, and I'm going to try diving in so that you don't have to. The plan is to build an emacs configuration from scratch with the goal of a data science workstation in mind, and will be aimed at folks like me - people who want to learn how this crazy emacs monster works, and are maybe a strong Vimmer, but haven't had the chance to really sit down an learn emacs yet. As such, this will be more than a "follow-along" configuration guide; rather I'm aiming to dig into the details, and weigh the merits of choosing one thing over another, especially as they compare against their (neo)vim counterparts. As long as I can keep up, the plan is one post a week, focusing on a single component to integrate, such as LSP, auto-complete, remote workflow, notebooks, packaging, Windows-specific forays, and so on. I may reference back to this article and change it up a bit as we learn more, so that this article can be the one-stop-shop on justification for "why emacs"?
At the end of the day, though, this whole process is largely to document my own learning process, so I can come back and say "why on earth did I do it this way? Oh, that's right…" There are already an enormous number of excellent learning materials out there for picking up emacs, so my recommendation for other people like me is to also give them a shot: